The ivory damsel is bored: changing female dynamics for the Ovidian Galatea in Michelangelo Antonioni’s "Identificazione di una Donna" (1982)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34640/ct9uma2024diogoKeywords:
Pygmalion myth, Michelangelo Antonioni, Ovid, female emancipationAbstract
The Pygmalion myth as told by Ovid gave rise to a literary tradition that cinema sought to eternalize in films such as Pygmalion et Galathée (Méliès, 1898), Funny Face (Donen, 1957), etc. In these, normally the female is submissive to the male. The same premise may also be indirectly found in Antonioni’s Identificazione di una Donna (1982), but under a different concoction. Instead of adopting a submissive stance towards Niccolò, Mavi, the ad hoc Galatea, is seen as a passive character in the way that she does behave uninterested towards loving Niccolò, the Pygmalion figure. This poise is characteristic of the typical ennui that permeates female characters in Antonioni’s films. This paper attempts to intersect the dramatis personae of the Ovidian myth with characters Niccolò and Mavi from Antonioni’s film and provide further analysis on the possibility of Mavi becoming a powerhouse for the liberation of the ivory damsel in contemporary narratives. Whilst conditioned to a specific environment of Antiquity, Ovid’s ivory jeune is set to behave according to what is expected of her — a voiceless extension of Pygmalion. Conversely, when exposed to contemporary metaliterary media, the ivory damsel can set free and rebel against a dominant male taxonomy.
References
Butterworth, G. W. (1919). Clement of Alexandria. The Exhortation to the Greeks. Harvard University Press.
Collard, C. (2008). Euripides. Fragments. Harvard University Press.
Cooper, C., Harris, E. M., Worthington, I. (2001). Dinarchus, Hyperides, and Lycurgus. University of Texas Press.
Diogo, S. (2023, novembro 10). To agalma: mirroring Galatea and building b*tches in music videos [Paper presentation]. AIMS, Antiquity in Media Studies Annual Conference.
Diogo, S. (2022). El Tableau Vivant Huele a Retrofuturism: Les Enfants Terribles, Soñadores y 365 Fresh! Retrofantástico. Perspectivas de un pasado imaginado, Cinestesia, 209-220.
Douglas Olson, S. (2010). Athenaeus. The Learned Banqueters. Volume VI. Harvard University Press.
Eco, U. (2013). Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation. Phoenix ebook. Epub version.
Fátima Silva, M. F. (2023). Eurípides. Fragmentos. Volume I. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
Franco, J. E. (2007). O mito da mulher em Vieira: teologia, representação e profecia. Islenha, 41, 04-33.
Fobes, F. H., Benner, A. R. (1949). The Letters of Alciphron, Aelian and Philostratus. Harvard University Press.
Gulick, C. B. (1999). Athenaeus. The Deipnosophists. Books XIII-XIV.653b. Harvard University Press.
Hinds-Scott, A. (2023). A Mythic Cinematic Universe? Making the multiverse in audio-visual reception. Panel Ancient Drama, Modern Media, Celtic Conference in Classics, Coimbra.
Höschele, R. & Bing, P. (2014). Aristaenetus, Erotic Letters. Society of Biblical Literature.
James, P. (2011). Ovid’s Myth of Pygmalion on Screen. In Pursuit of the Perfect Woman. Bloomsbury.
Kelly, W. (1984). [Review of Identification of a Woman, by M. Antonioni]. Film Quarterly, 37(3), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3697198
Law, H. H. (1932). The Name Galatea in the Pygmalion Myth. The Classical Journal, 27(5), 337–342. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3290617
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 06-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Mulvey, L. (2014). Le Mépris and its Story of Cinema: a Fabric of Quotations. L’Atalante, 18, 27-35.
Reinhold, M. (1971). The Naming of Pygmalion’s Animated Statue. The Classical Journal, 66(4), 316–319. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3296568
Ryan, J. (1993). More Seductive Than Phryne: Baudelaire, Gérôme, Rilke, and the Problem of Autonomous Art. PMLA, 108(5), 1128–1141. https://doi.org/10.2307/462990
Rodrigues, N. S. (2007). A donzela de marfim. A agalmatofilia como representação estética na Antiguidade Clássica. Artis, (6), 61-71.
Tomasulo, F. P. (1996). [Review of The Architecture of Vision: Writings and Interviews on Cinema, by M. Antonioni, C. di Carlo, G. Tinazzi, & M. Cottino-Jones]. Journal of Film and Video, 48(4), 54–56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20688121
Wentzel, R. (2018). Myth, technology, and love in Spike Jones’ Her. 21st Century Popular Classics, 2, 01-14. https://fass.open.ac.uk/sites/fass.open.ac.uk/files/files/new-voices-journal/proceedings/volume2/Paper_1.pdf
Winkler, M. M. (2005). Neo-Mythologism: Apollo and the Muses on the Screen. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 11(3), 383–423. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221990
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sílvia Catarina Pereira Diogo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
For more information follow the link: CC Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0